Skip to content
Free U.S. Standard shipping · Free international Standard shipping over US$150. Free U.S. shipping · International free over US$150.

Explore HealthspanX

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Feng Chen, Disheng Zhou, Alice Pik-Shan Kong, Nga Ting Yim, Siyu Dai, Yu Nan Chen, Lai Ling Hui

Current Diabetes Reports · 2024 · 25(1):4

Study at a glance

Design
Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Population or model
Middle-aged and older adults in eight RCTs; mainly non-diabetic
Sample size
8 RCTs; 342 participants
Intervention
Oral NMN 250–2,000 mg/day for 14 days to 12 weeks versus control
Publication type
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Evidence class
review-perspective
Research area
Glucose and lipid metabolism
Trial registration
Not applicable.

Study endpoints

  • Fasting glucose
  • Fasting insulin
  • HbA1c
  • HOMA-IR
  • Lipid profile

Plain-language summary

This systematic review pooled eight randomized NMN trials involving 342 adults to test whether short-term NMN supplementation improves conventional glucose-control or lipid outcomes.

Across the pooled analyses, NMN did not significantly improve fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, or lipid profiles.

The review therefore provides an important counterweight to broad metabolic-benefit claims: raising NAD-related biomarkers does not automatically translate into measurable improvements in standard glucose or lipid endpoints.

Key findings

  • Eight RCTs involving 342 adults were included.
  • Doses ranged from 250 to 2,000 mg/day for 14 days to 12 weeks.
  • No significant pooled benefit was found for fasting glucose, fasting insulin, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, or lipid profile.
  • The included evidence was short term and based mainly on relatively healthy adults.

Limitations

  • Only eight RCTs were available.
  • Trials were small and short.
  • Participants and intervention doses varied across studies.
  • Most participants were relatively healthy and non-diabetic.
  • Meta-analysis cannot overcome limitations or biases in the underlying trials.

Funding and transparency

Funding

See source publication for funding disclosures.

Competing interests

See source publication for competing-interest disclosures.

HealthspanX observation

This synthesis is particularly important for preventing NAD biomarker changes from being presented as proof of broad metabolic benefit.

Interpretive weight

Limited

Systematic review and meta-analysis of eight short-term RCTs, but the evidence base was small, heterogeneous and mainly involved relatively healthy middle-aged or older adults.

This record summarizes a publication; it is not medical advice or a claim that a HealthspanX product reproduces the study's results. Report a correction.

Your cart (0)

Your cart is empty.

Explore Ultra Pure NMN, read the label and choose your pack when you’re ready.

HealthspanX

What are you looking for?

Useful starting points