Systematic review and meta-analysis

Safety and Metabolism-Related Outcomes of Oral Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Supplementation in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wenyu Yang et al. · Nutrients · 2026

Evidence type: Systematic review and meta-analysis Interpretive weight: ModerateResearch area: Human safety and metabolic outcomes
DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of parallel randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment
PopulationAdults in oral NMN or NMN-related randomized trials
Sample15 randomized trials; 10 contributed to safety meta-analyses
InterventionOral NMN or NMN-related preparations, 250–2,000 mg/day for 14 days to 24 weeks
EndpointsOverall and serious adverse events; Withdrawals due to adverse events; System-specific adverse events; ALT and AST; Body weight and BMI; Fasting glucose and HbA1c; Lipid profiles; HOMA-IR; Systolic and diastolic blood pressure

What the publication reported

This 2026 systematic review searched six databases through May 13, 2026 and included 15 parallel randomized adult NMN trials.

Short-term NMN did not show a clear increase in overall, serious, withdrawal-related or system-specific adverse events, and ALT and AST were not significantly elevated. At the same time, pooled analyses did not show significant benefits for body weight, BMI, fasting glucose, HbA1c, lipid profiles or systolic blood pressure.

A small diastolic-blood-pressure reduction and a non-significant HOMA-IR trend were reported, but the authors characterized these as preliminary signals requiring larger and longer trials.

Key findings

  • Fifteen parallel randomized trials were included; ten contributed to safety analyses.
  • Doses ranged from 250 to 2,000 mg/day and durations from 14 days to 24 weeks.
  • No clear increase was found in overall, serious, withdrawal-related or system-specific adverse events.
  • ALT and AST were not significantly elevated.
  • Body weight, BMI, fasting glucose, HbA1c, lipid profiles and systolic blood pressure showed no significant pooled benefit.
  • Diastolic blood pressure decreased slightly; HOMA-IR showed a non-significant downward trend.

What it cannot establish

  • The longest included trials lasted 24 weeks, so long-term safety remains unknown.
  • Trials were generally small and heterogeneous.
  • Some NMN-related formulations may not be identical to standard NMN supplements.
  • Many metabolic outcomes were secondary endpoints.
  • Rare adverse events cannot be ruled out by the current sample sizes.
HealthspanX claim boundary: This review supports favorable short-term tolerability across studied trials, not proof of long-term safety, anti-aging efficacy, disease prevention, longevity or broad metabolic benefit.

Continue reviewing

Return to the complete evidence library.

Source fields verified